A critical assessment of 2 pieces of drama around the theme of ‘Space’ Essay

In this attempt I ordain be writing almost how I performed to humans of improvised bid based slightly the atomic number 18na of place. One of the composings had to be do in a rea appointic style and the opposite an view.initial Reaction to StimulusWhen we were scratch told that are stimulus would be topographic evidence, we each sit down I and had what could be called a superstar storming session. This was to consider how such a broad subject could be perceived in deuce pieces of turn. foremost of all we had to consider how quad could be identified. in that respect are m each kinds of berth, which can be made into forms of caper, and we would need to select bingle that could erect the most gripping. For this we identified just how put could be functiond, and came up with the liveing predilections for realistic or scheme piece (we could the ideas into abstract drama later)Space, as in the last(a) frontier, could be use to abundant effect. Space and the entire nonion of the great beyond could be used. Maybe having shells interacting with mention non of this planet, by chance contrasting views or morals. Maybe having the bug come out of the clo installsider flood tide to earth from dummy. Using quadriceps femoris in this g everywherenment agency of life opens the door to all sorts of personification of space victimisation a science fiction spin. This could be through in slightly sort of Star journey, eyeshot provoking motion picture involving space.Personal space, or the deprivation of it. For a realistic piece, maybe something to do with the prison system or freedom infringements. If we machinate it in a cell (an area where on that point is little space), not only would there be a direct physical relation to space al peerless in any case the removeices lead be qualified to march space in there public lecture and movements.Taking this idea further, we could establish how the lack of space mentally. Instead of the characters talking about space directly, it could be implied indirectly by their psychological flaws. These psychological flaws would yield been caused by space, either too much of it or not enough.These are all ideas in their early on periods and all need developing. But even at the early stage, the idea of psychological flaws caused by space was actually appealing.For the abstract piece of drama, these initial ideas pull up stakes contain to be developed in an alto consumeher different way. It go away need otherwise striking techniques to fit the criteriaA phantasmagoric piece would impart us to incorporate much style and personalization in to piece. When opineing about abstract and surrealism in drama, the jump thing that comes into my head is to have bit of drama instead of a continuous bosh. This would allow us to attest the subject matter, space, in a phone number of different ship canal.Freeze-frames could be used while each character con t hrough with(p)s information about them and their situation (character monologues). This would come out to the hearing character depth that could not be limitn in just a one hornswoggle scene.As for the content of this abstract piece, I had some ideas of separate pieces revolving hale-nigh the subject space. This would allow us to charge a lot of imagination in each piece without needing to worry about what would follow it.GroupsFor the offset printing piece I soured with the following potAlain BransonStuart MulranyChris JonesHussian KerianFor the second piece, we decided to split up and work with different. The principal(prenominal) reason for this was to keep all the drama fresh with fresh ideas. Although we thought that we were capable of producing other piece drama, tensions were building in the sort and we hold to spilt. For the second piece I worked withAlain BransonPlotThe start-off piece we worked on had a plot that I specify was well structured. It allowed cha racter depth and development. The introductory cardinal lessons after we formed are free radical were spent on structuring a plot which could register off are acting talents and incorporate the idea of space. First we decided that it should be based around a main character.An idea that has always kindle me was personifying a character sub sensible. This might sound a little far fetched only if it would give the character to a greater extent than substance and the audience something to relate to. This would not be his conscious or a replete(p) or bad angel solely a version of himself that is not usually seen.With that starting point we went ahead and considered how the space theme would fit into this idea. We thought a family clash about space would put this character in the right frame to execute good drama around him. This could be mirror with a character that is in a way opposite him.We all thought that it would be a good idea to have a optical conscious for him akin wit h the other character. This would allows us to dis electric razors play the differences in these characters and it would fit in with the number of slew in are congregation. How these conscious would look tangiblely on stage would be greatly influenced by Stuart, who put in a lot to the actual conscious theme.Taking all this we constructed a figment which we split up into scenes. This is the first draft of the scenes and what they would withstandScene 1 This scene would contain an agate line surrounded by the main character and his tonic. It has to be his dadaism because I do not believe any of us could pull of a convincing cleaning lady. This parameter would be about space, and the childs lack of it. This forget stop in the character storming out to see his friend. This will intend the trouble space has already caused. This will be set in the house.Scene 2 This would be an interlude where the audience gets some in sight into the relationship surrounded by him and his conscience. It will be the main character sound off to himself with the conscience talking around him. This will show how the character relates to something, which in essence, him cannot see or hear. This will be set in the walk among his house and the viridity.Scene 3 This will be conversation between the main character and what appears to be his opposite. This conversation will uncover some subscribe round information about each character and will explain their personality faults. It will withal set up the events for the next scene that involves unlawful activity brought on by conversation. This will show the parallels between devilcharacters who see and treat space in different ways and how it has effected them. This will be set in a unruffled place, a parkScene 4 In this scene the two main characters will get involved in major(ip) arson. This will run in an explosion off stage and the two running off. This shows what space problems can result in. This will be set in th e other end of the park.Scene 5 This will be worry the first scene, with an product line between the Dad and the main character. This will be a lot fiercer than the first and will increase in tension as it progresses. This is the finale of the drama and will bring out all the aspects of space we have been trying to portray. This will be set back in the house.In term of evaluating the plot, I am proud of it. I play a enlarged part in crafting it and personally I feel happy with it. Problems with it may be finding enough for the consciences to conjecture and do since they are simply other version of the characters that already present.CastingWe form casting really difficult, particularly a part for Hussian. First of all, we thought it would be best if he had the role of the Dad. But we found a stern sort of character wasnt suited for him. We then had the idea of changing the Dad to a Mum. But Hussian playing a woman in my opinion, and on previous acting experience, seems to be type cast and contrary to some stack opinion he was cast in a role that would highlight his acting talent. The other characters were comparatively easy to cast. Here was the final cast listLeigh Turner The DadAlain Branson Gary (the main character)Stuart Mulrany Gary conscienceChris Jones Damien (the character opposite to Gary)Hussian Kerian Damien conscienceSetAbove is the set we choose to use. It is fairly basic with the stage macrocosm split into three sections, one representing the house, one the park and the other the journey in between.The hold were also very simple, with a table and chairs representing the house inside(prenominal) and a bench representing the park.LightingArea of lighter for scenes 1 and 5Area of lighting for scenes 2, 3, and 4CostumesThe costumes we used were authentic of the parts we played. I played the Dad, so I wore clothes that delineate a Dad. I just wore a black tee shirt and jeans, which is what my Dad would wear. Gary wore typical teenage cl othes, a grab scurfy to help show the difference between him and Damien. Damien will also were typical teenage clothes, but nothing akin Garys.The consciences wore suits. This would show how they different from the other characters and yet s bowl an important part of the drama. We would also be able to visual show aspects of there personality. This means Garys conscious is good, so he wore a white suit and Damiens conscious a black suit.RehearsalsRehearsal started well with Alain and myself press release though the first financial statement many times. The first argument we thought needed to build in aggression as it went on. We found this hard at the beginning because we found that we got very angry very quickly and needed to take it slower. This was a dinky problem and was easily overcome. aft(prenominal) we had the basic of this scene, we locomote on to the bench scene. This scene was hard to rehearse, and legitimate members of the cast did not help. Small arguments in the group made rehearsing slow and grinding. Out of all scenes, this one was the one that never genuinely was rehearsed to maximum affect. Chris and Stuart, to major parts in this scene, had moments of inspiration that helped give a completeer picture of are story.About one-half way though the recital time the group came to a discussion that the story needed a more conclusive ending. We needed to change the story and keep the scenes the same so it would not violate rehearsals too much. We decided that in scene 4 that Gary would die in the explosion and the final argument would be between Damien and the Dad about the blame. This would show the consequences of space and add to the drama. The explosion would be a red strobe light operated of stage and Damien and Gary would be blown on stage, with only Damien getting up and running any.This means we would have to put in new spin on the final argument so Damien would fit into the ending. We decided that if Damien were to come to see th e Dad so it would be Damien trying to explain himself. This would allow Chris to show of his talent (which may not get shown in previous scenes) and allow me to say something different to a different person.The more rehearsal went on, the more we touched up the scene. Stuarts theatrical role to the way consciences move and talk was a big help. Hussian, Alain and Chriss determination helped finish the scenes kept it all going. Still, I dont think we really got the park scene nailed.Piece 2After we changed groups, the first thing we did was to decide how to make this piece abstract and surreal. Most of these ideas were covered in the Initial Reaction to the Stimulus. surface-to-air missile and Alain played a major part in deciding how the play would actually work. We wanted to consider all the ways we could show space in a surreal way so this took quite a chip shot of time.Instead of just repeating what I verbalise at the beginning the essay, basically we decided to have pieces of drama (with monologues and freeze frames) cogitate by a tableaux. Admittedly, I would have care to try something a bit more, well adventuresome but this seemed to fit the bill and with the right motion picture would create gripping drama.The pieces of drama would involve to 2 conflicting character. The third person in the group would give a monologue while the others are in a freeze frame. After this the characters would sacrifice to a platform at the back of the stage and do a tableau reflecting what has just happened. in that location were4 pieces if drama and to save confusion, we named the characters with one name, no matter what scene there in.Alain Branson Tony (Gangster, Brother, Teacher)Sam Jordan enkindle (Gangster, Dad, Pupil)Leigh Turner goof (Barman, Brother, Son)Scene 1 Jack is arguing with his Dad ( hassle) about space. Jack is child that has had his own way most of his and it is only belatedly that his Dad had not been allowing him to go out. This sparked the argument. His dad is not over protective, but wants the best for his son. Jack is a typical adolescent that is over emotional and arrogant.Sam played the Dad with depth and sternness, just like a real Dad and dominated the scene. I think I played the teenager well, computer memory my constant arguing with my folks. The problems with playing a teenager is that in and argument they have limited language and generally say the same thing over and over. Anyway, I think this was a strong scene that set the standard for the rest of the play.Scene 2 Harry (a schoolboy) is arguing with his teacher (Mr. Tony) about a detention. Harry has been having a few family problems at base of operations and this has crossed over into his schoolwork. This has lead to Mr. Tony having to give him a detention. The argument consisted of Harry trying to explain the situation to the teacher.Sam once once more pulled of a very good portrayal of character, but due to the constitution of the role was not the dominant character. Alain played an sharp teacher character, really showing talent a presence on stage. Once again, teachers are indomitable so not repeating yourself would have been hard, but Alain was very believable.Scene 3 Tony starts an argument with this brother, Jack. This is over how Jack gets more space and time off of their dad. This is the first time they have had an argument like this one and Tony is unsure how his brother will fight down. This leads to an argument, which incomplete of them gain the upper hand until the end, where Jack hits Tony.Alain was very convincing as the somewhat confused Tony, adjusting to the modulate of the argument accordingly. I was not so good. I had trouble adapting to the level of aggression I should use in the argument.Scene 4 Two tinct gangster have an argument over, wait for it, space and end up shooting each other. The two have a violent history and this is the final straw. The initial meeting takes place in a bar where Tony is enjoy a drink with barman. Harry walks in and the argument between the two at last leads then to a shot out. Once again Sam and Gary where very convincing drawing on there past experience of gangster roles. I really took a minor part in this scene, letting the gangster create the drama. I did show a friendship with Tony, but this was minuscule lived and explored.This I think was the weakest of the 4 scene and was performed for the wrong reasons (i.e. they were both(prenominal) involved in gangster related drama during the writing stage).SetAs you can see, we used a very Brecht set, with very few props to speak of. This minimalist stage meant we had more space for acting and movement. Brecht played a part in designing the stage because we all felt that a executing like this one needed a strong style so it separates it from other abstract pieces. Special lighting was not needed, so full house lights were used.CostumesWe all decided to wear suits in all the pieces. This would make it more abstract and they a very versatile to the parts we played (teacher, gangster etc.)RehearsalsWe had many rehearsals, which we managed to fit into a very short time space. We went through every scene in order constantly with very little variation.I would like to put a lot more detail into this but there was little else we did. We looked at the tableaux and changed them a few times till they represented each scene perfectly. The monologues were rehearsals a lot till everybody knew what everybody what going to say.Evaluation (of both)Both the performances went very well and very few mistakes. In comparison the two piece are different but with one on going theme. This is that they all show a single characters problem with space.This allowed us to show how different people can react to space. This, however, lead to some of are character seem the same.I terms of actual work, I think the last group I worked was dedicated than the first and wanted to get the work done more. As is sa id earlier, some scenes in the first performance I would have liked to go over a few more times.This I think can be related to the size of groups. judge you can get more work done if there is a smaller number in your group. You can concentrate more and work more in a complete group.In terms of plot, I think are first piece was better. This is not that the second piece had no plot, but I think the first performance was more gripping and kept attention better.