Comparison Contrast of Death of a Salesman and Glengarry Ross

Sasha Schmidt Midterm Essay Question 4 Jeannine Rus carry on 10/28/12 The ad fair(a) Criminal Being a salesman has ever so carried a interdict stigma since the beforehand(predicate) 1900s. Being captivaten as pushy, high pressure, unavailing people the dreaded activity of purchase few car or upstart appliance has haunted e realone at some point or another. Many manner of speaking aro social occasion come to describe salesman such(prenominal) as sharks, cons, thieves etc. , and these words have stuck with the profession throughout the century. Two very realistic depictions of such phonies can be seen in Death of A Salesman by Arthur Miller and Glengarry Glen Ross by David Mamet.They depict the styles of 2 salesmen who have very similar interchange techniques, solely at the same prison term can be contrastingly different. Willy Loman, the jock of Death of a Salesman, is oft regarded as a tragic figure with whom the listening feels sympathetic. At the same time, his u navailing, dishonest, adulterous slipway atomic number 18 despised. In addition to this, his everywhere confident attitude seems supercilious and creates more of a disdain for the character as can be seen when he says Goddammit, I could sell them (Miller 1071). The same can be said as Mamets character, Shelly Levene, starts declaring how considerable of a seller he was.Basking in his own light he boldly exclaims that his success as a salesman is repayable not to his luck but his skill( Mamet 1419). Both characters a lot times conversation about how back in the daytimelight they were great assets of the company averaging a c and seventy dollars a week in commissions (p. 1089) and Cold calling. Nothing. Sixty-five, when we were on that point (Mamet 1419). Both characters hit their tragic ends as they realize that their deceitful and deceptive nature, the facade of great merchandising they recognized behind, is a shattered reality. All both(prenominal)(prenominal) of them want is a chance and to live like they did in the old years and both are denied the chance.While their characters mimic for each one other, the interchange techniques of these two are on the whole different. Willys approach is to go in making natural conversation and the client feel as if they are human. overmuch to his chagrin is the new reality he is facing, where its all cut and dried, and theres no chance for saving friendship to bear(Miller 1089). In contrast, Levene takes on the role of cut and dried sales techniques, often using his other associates as pretend clients in suppose to just puddle the sell, whether or not hes romping extorting money out of his clients. office from the beginning, he is trying to con leads out of Williamson, his supervisor. I need the leads, he boldly tells Williamson who reluctantly begins to make him a deal (Mamet 1418). Right from the get go, Leven is already using the usage techniques he uses day in and day out on his co-worker s even. Loman pushes his honest, integrity, and personality traits as the key to selling success, though we see an obvious decline in his selling abilities compared to the others. That being said, both characters are static very flawed with illusions of owning their own companies and wait for the right client to come along.They both still have some noisome personality traits and are still put on a facade to trick people however, Willy Loman is tricking his family while Shelly Levene is tricking his consumers. Hard selling is a selling technique in which the salesman manipulates the psychological state of the consumer in order to achieve a sale, whether or not the sale is good (Baron & Branscombe). There is elfin concern for the consumer at all, in fact, often times the seller knows that the consumer is going to be placed into a bad situation, but they specifically rely on the ego-depletion of these buyers.They use a variation of techniques such as door-in-the-face and foot-in-t he door just to name a few (Baron & Branscombe). Miller and Mamet depict this from the salesmans side. They place this psychologically demanding technique at fault of the company, who requires them to sell a conclusion amount or face endpoint from the job. Such fear could incite high pressure selling techniques, which actually make the consumer and the seller feel uncomfortable.Mamet and Miller pink such deceptive techniques through their plays, spotlight the negative effects (the destruction of the of import unit) and exacerbating the flaws of the technique. The role of a salesman has been get down of America since the very beginning. With its recent whirling in the 1900s, it has now been associated with a negative stereotype often depicted by movies, literature, and plays. While there might be individual differences in the selling techniques, sellers are all perceived the same dishonest, deceitful, and as con artists.Such a stigma created by their lack of concern after the sell has been made often reconfirms this stereotype. These prejudices notwithstanding, society often places a high demand on consumerism to help the economy and pushing the achievement of the American dream. Miller and Mamet uncover the treacheries of the salesman intentness leaving the question as to whom the neat criminal is society or the salesman. kit and boodle Cited Jacobus, Lee A. The Bedford Introduction to Drama. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2009. Print. Baron, Robert A. , and Nyla R. Branscombe. societal Psychology. Boston Pearson, 2012. Print.